Ask The Writer

E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

When writing in first person, is it possible to include another character's thoughts without changing point of view?

ONLINE EXCLUSIVE
By Brandi Reissenweber
Published: May 4, 2011
Brandi Reissenweber
Brandi Reissenweber
Q: When a writer uses first person, is it possible to include what another character might be thinking without changing point of view? If so, how?

A: When writing in first person, you’re limited to only what the first person narrator knows. You can’t actually include another character’s thoughts, as that would be shifting into another perspective. Still, there may be moments where you want to reveal what another character might be thinking and you can accomplish that while still staying in your narrator’s perspective.

Let the other character betray his or her thoughts through dialogue or action. In “After the Plague,” a short story by T.C. Boyle, disease has wiped out most the population. The plague hits when the narrator has isolated himself in the Sierra foothills. His first human contact after the plague is Sarai, a woman who was hiking and lost her way after her partner disappeared, and who bangs on the narrator’s cabin door desperate for help. Sarai doesn’t believe the narrator’s claim that the population has been wiped out, so after she regains her strength they go into town. Dust has settled on the unused gas pumps at the station, animals have raided the abandoned grocery store and the phone lines are dead.  Still, Sarai resists the truth. The narrator decides to go back to the cabin. He is about to try to convince her one last time to join him:

Before I could open my mouth she bent for a stone and heaved it into the windshield, splintering me with flecks and shards of safety glass. “Die!” she shrieked. “You die, you sh*t!”

That night we slept together for the first time. In the morning, we packed up a few things and drove down the snaking mountain road to the charnel house of the world.

Sarai is angry. Her harsh words make that clear. But she also seems resigned. After all, she returns to the cabin with the narrator instead of striking out on her own in search of other people. The fact that she sleeps with him reveals something more—a need for comfort and companionship.

You can also let the first person narrator consider the other character’s thoughts. In “Crazy Life,” a short story by Lou Mathews, Dulcie, the narrator, visits her boyfriend in jail. He was involved in a drive-by murder and Dulcie tries to get the true story of what happened from him:

Chuey, I said, were you driving? He just looks at me for awhile and then says, yeah. I ask, How come you were driving?

He had the shotgun, Chuey said, I had to drive.

I can tell when Chuey’s lying, which is most of the time; I think he was telling the truth. Chuey, I said. You’re crazy. They’ll put you both away. You don’t owe Sleepy nothing.  

There’s still some doubt—perhaps Chuey is lying—but the reader relies on Dulcie’s knowledge of Chuey to learn more of what may be going on in his mind.  

You can also have your first person narrator imagine his way into character’s thoughts. In F. Scott Fitzgerald’s novel The Great Gatsby, Nick Carraway, the narrator, didn’t witness Gatsby and Daisy’s first kiss, but he imagines his way into the scene. He also imagines Gatsby’s thoughts in the moment:

His heart beat faster and faster as Daisy's white face came up to his own. He knew that when he kissed this girl, and forever wed his unutterable visions to her perishable breath, his mind would never romp again like the mind of God. So he waited, listening for a moment longer to the tuning fork that had been struck upon a star. Then he kissed her.

Did Gatsby actually think that “his mind would never romp again like the mind of God” right before he kissed Daisy? Perhaps. The reader doesn’t know how much of this Gatsby has supplied Nick in conversation. He may have told Nick those very words. Or Nick may have invented them based on what Gatsby did share and what he knows about Gatsby’s personality. If the reader finds Nick reliable—and most do—they’ll likely find this moment quite plausible.

There are point of view strategies that do include multiple first-person narrators. Serial first-person point of view, for instance, uses a series of first-person narratives to tell a story. But when you choose one first-person narrator, you still have some room to invite the thoughts of other characters into the story. You just have to do it through the filter of your first-person narrator.
Brandi Reissenweber teaches fiction writing and reading fiction at Gotham Writers' Workshop and authored the chapter on characterization in Gotham's Writing Fiction: The Practical Guide. Her work has been published in numerous journals, including Phoebe, North Dakota Quarterly and Rattapallax. She was a James C. McCreight Fiction Fellow at the Wisconsin Institute for Creative Writing and has taught fiction at New York University, University of Wisconsin and University of Chicago. Currently, she is a visiting professor at Illinois Wesleyan University.

Send your questions on the craft of creative writing to writingquestions@writermag.com. All of Brandi's other Ask The Writer columns are available to registered users.
User Comments
Only registered members of WriterMag.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
4 stars
MICHAELE LOCKHART from ARIZONA said:
Great article, as always. Some of the words I use in class are: speculation, filter (as you suggested), imagine, and of course, the ultimate good fix is to work in dialogue. First person is devilishly tricky that way--only what the POV narrator can see, feel, think, touch, smell, hear, etc. Rather lonely, I'd say, from my first person POV. ;-)
BRANDI REISSENWEBER from ILLINOIS said:
Thanks, Mindi--for your kind words and for reading.
BRANDI REISSENWEBER from ILLINOIS said:
Marguerite, while most stories have dialogue, it’s not a hard and fast rule that you must include it. This is as true of first person as it is for other point of view strategies. This makes me think of Joyce Carol Oates’ short story “. . .& Answers” which includes only the answers to what is clearly a question and answer session. Lines of speech from other characters—and there aren’t many—are filtered through her: “If my husband says that, it must be true. I believe him. I wake up and he’s shaking me, he’s frightened and seems ready to cry, he says, [begin italics] ‘Wake up! You’re having a nightmare!’[end italics] He says that I scream at night sometimes.”

Mary, great comment! Not having access to the other characters’ thoughts can be a wonderful asset to a first person narration. The depth to which we sink into one character’s perspective—with all its limitations and biases—is a real benefit of first person.

Lori, there are some lovely works of fiction that do just that—cycle through several perspectives. Russell Banks’ novel The Sweet Hereafter uses a series of first person narrators to tell the story of a bus crash that killed most the town’s children and its aftermath. You get the broader scope that comes with omniscience but the intimacy that comes with first person.

Barbara, I’m glad you found this useful! Good luck combing through that novel making sure you stay in voice and in the correct perspective.
5 stars
MINDI ANDERSON from ILLINOIS said:
Wise advice, as always, Brandi.
BRANDI REISSENWEBER from ILLINOIS said:
Travis,

If I’m reading your question as you intend, it sounds like you want to use a blend of first person and second. That approach might look something like this: "At the end of the line to the Ferris wheel, I stood on my toes and tried to see past the concessions but I already knew Johnny wasn’t on his way. [begin italics] You knew you should have met her at the carnival. You made a bad choice. So bad, you probably shouldn’t bother calling her again. [end italics]"

This might fall under the category of point of view strategies that include multiple narrators, but it presents some potential problems. 1) It’s a shift in point of view strategy from first to second and, presumably, back to first. That’s a lot of jumping around and—if done in quick succession—can be a frustrating constant redefinition of the overall strategy for the reader. 2) It interrupts the flow of the first person narrative. Certainly there are occasions where a writer might want to do this, but it's important to weigh the benefits with the issues such an approach raises. 3) It puts the narrative in a position to refer to the first person narrator in third person when in the other character’s thoughts. This has the potential to be confusing.

Perhaps this might work if you’re in each narrative mode (1st and 2nd) for extended periods of time. I’m thinking of a novel like Broke Heart Blues by Joyce Carol Oates, which includes large chunks of first person plural narration as well as a large chunk of third person narration. There’s not a lot of switching back and forth.
12
Free Newsletter
Get our free newsletter