Feb. 2, 2008Although many members of the Association of Writers and Writing Programs (AWP) don't teach creative writing, the group serves as an umbrella professional organization for those who do. So it's not surprising that so much of the 2008 conference in New York City includes faculty readings and tributes, conversations on issues in creative writing pedagogy, and other teaching-related topics. Yesterday I attended two memorable sessions--each with a very different focus--that drove home that point even more powerfully.
A noon panel on "Translation in MFA Programs" discussed exactly that topic. I should disclose that the panel was developed and moderated by
my friend B.J. Epstein, and since I respect her work so much I'm not surprised the panel was so good. It raised several questions that deserve further attention.
For instance: Is translation itself "creative" (or, as some panelists suggested, "re-creative") writing in the way that we regard other types of writing taught in MFA programs? Is it something we might consider a natural complement to other genres: fiction, poetry, creative nonfiction, or children's writing, for example? Is it something writers might similarly pursue through study and practice and nurture into a profession? Is it something more MFA programs should offer, either as degree specializations or, at the very least, among workshops and seminars? These panelists sure made me think so. Listening to them, and thumbing through my mental files on all the authors I've read in translation--from Hans Christian Andersen to Leo Tolstoy--I realized that yes, the dedication to language, the focus on the "right" word or expression, and the sensitivity to literary forms and traditions and innovations that we consider essential to the works of accomplished poets or novelists characterizes equally those of the best literary translators.
As much as that first panel impressed my mind, the second one, titled "Absent Friends--Virginia Tech Memorial Reading"--moved my heart.
We all remember the tragedy that occurred on the Virginia Tech campus on April 16, 2007. For most of us, that was a terrible but distant news story. But for those members of Virginia Tech's creative writing community, it was a personal heartbreak, one they were ready to share via their writing at AWP.
In his introductory remarks, Robin Allnutt told us that this occasion marked the first time his faculty colleagues were participating together in a public memorial reading. He further signaled the session's exceptionality when he said that after they'd presented their work, the participants would not follow the common practice of taking audience questions.
As Allnutt read his essay, and was followed by Fred D'Aguiar's poetic evocation of his own slain student, I began to comprehend more fully how very unusual this conference session was going to be. But it wasn't until Katie Fallon came to the podium, and, visibly struggling to retain her composure, started reading a piece called "No Sanctuary," and brought us right into her freshman composition classroom in late August 2006, just after another (albeit infinitely less consequential) campus crisis, and introduced us to another student, one Fallon described as the epitome of serenity, who lost her life on April 16, that the tears came. Mine. Others'.
Just then, just as the atmosphere seemed most charged and Fallon's reading seemed nearly to crackle with grief--an alarm sounded.
Maybe if it had been another panel or another reading, someone would have ducked into the hall to investigate while the audience remained seated, and Fallon's reading, and the session itself, would have continued uninterrupted. But in a New York City where the World Trade Center no longer stands, in a session dedicated to remembering those absent friends from Virginia Tech, and precisely when Fallon was sharing her realization that despite the peacefulness her student had exuded there truly is "no sanctuary" in this world, we filed out. Quickly.
Downstairs in the hotel lobby there was no alarm. Nothing seemed amiss. Conference-goers filled the bar area, and conversations buzzed. As I left the building, heading uptown for my next event (this one off-site), I heard no sirens. I saw no emergency personnel. If we'd been in any danger in that second-floor meeting room, I discovered nothing about it when I checked online a few hours later.
I don't know if the faculty readers returned to their assigned room, if the session resumed, if other audience members came back. Perhaps I'll find out today. But I can't help worrying that this session, which the participants from Virginia Tech may have dared to hope might provide some healing-some serenity-did exactly the opposite.